Today, the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ) published the results of the practical test completed by candidates in the competition for positions at the HACC.

A total of 73 out of 85 candidates advanced to the next stage, which is nearly 86%.

As a result, there are 3.2 candidates per vacant HACC judgeship—significantly better than in the previous competition, where there were just 0.3 candidates per position.

As reported earlier, the HQCJ held the practical part of the exam on November 12 and 14. Eighty-five of the 87 candidates who reached this stage took part. Each candidate completed two tasks of different types: the first involved drafting a first-instance court judgment, and the second drafting a ruling following appellate review of a judgment. Each task was worth 75 points (150 points in total). The passing threshold was set at 75%, or 112.5 points.

The following candidates successfully passed this stage:

  1. Viktor Antypenko
  2.  Viktoriia Bazeliuk
  3. Anton Baida
  4. Oleh Batiuk
  5. Yurii Bodnaruk
  6. Volodymyr Bubleinyk
  7. Oleksandr Vernyhor
  8. Maksym Hloba
  9. Mykhailo Hrabynskyi
  10. Nazar Hryn
  11. Oksana Hutsal
  12. Yevhen Didenko
  13. Nataliia Doroshenko
  14. Vitalii Dubas
  15. Andrii Dudikov
  16. Oleksandr Dudchenko
  17. Oksana Yevlakh
  18. Oleksii Yevtushenko
  19. Oleksandr Zavhorodnii
  20. Oleksii Zaitsev
  21. Oleksandr Ivasyn
  22. Yevhen Kapitonov
  23. Viktoriia Kytsiuk
  24. Oleh Kimstachov
  25. Yana Kinakh
  26. Oleksandr Kitov
  27. Denys Kovalenko
  28. Serhii Kovalchuk
  29. Snizhanna Kolesnyk
  30. Tetiana Kononenko
  31. Vitalii Koriahin
  32. Oleh Kostiuk
  33. Dmytro Kravets
  34. Ivan Kravchenko
  35. Tetiana Kryklyva
  36. Vitalii Kryklyvyi
  37. Iryna Kuzina
  38. Vladyslav Kukhta
  39. Oleksandr Leonov
  40. Ihor Makaryk
  41. Oleh Marchuk
  42. Viktor Maslov
  43. Vita Matolych
  44. Nataliia Makhno
  45. Dmytro Movchan
  46. Natalia Movchan
  47. Stanislav Nesterenko
  48. Ihor Nikitchuk
  49. Ihor Omelian
  50. Dmytro Ostapenko
  51. Oleksandr Ostrohliad
  52. Olha Pevna
  53. Mykola Pika
  54. Ivan Posokhov
  55. Oleksandr Prokhorov
  56. Yuliia Retynska
  57. Olena Roiik
  58. Petro Romanenko
  59. Mykola Rubashchenko
  60. Serhii Syvokin
  61. Kateryna Sikora
  62. Lesia Skreklia
  63. Inna Smal
  64. Olena Tanasevych
  65. Iryna Teslenko
  66. Iryna Tokarska
  67. Tetiana Troian
  68. Oleh Khamkhodera
  69. Kostiantyn Kharakoz
  70. Vadym Khodko
  71. Ihor Chaikin
  72. Pavlo Shtifonov
  73. Marta-Mariia Yatsynina

Next, the publication of the practical papers is expected for those candidates who grant the HQCJ permission to do so. This would increase trust in the competition results,

allow the professional community to assess the actual quality of the work, and protect the HQCJ itself from accusations of a lack of transparency.

Lawyers who successfully pass all stages of the exam will then undergo scrutiny by the Public Council of International Experts, which will assess whether the finalists meet the required standards of integrity and professional ethics to serve as HACC judges.

array(3) { ["quote_image"]=> bool(false) ["quote_text"]=> string(255) "A total of 73 out of 85 candidates advanced to the next stage, which is nearly 86%. As a result, there are 3.2 candidates per vacant HACC judgeship—significantly better than in the previous competition, where there were just 0.3 candidates per position." ["quote_author"]=> string(0) "" }

A total of 73 out of 85 candidates advanced to the next stage, which is nearly 86%. As a result, there are 3.2 candidates per vacant HACC judgeship—significantly better than in the previous competition, where there were just 0.3 candidates per position.