On September 18, the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) reached the final stage in admitting 205 applicants to the qualification evaluation for 23 vacant judicial positions at the High Anti-Corruption Court. 

Over two days, the Commission, after reviewing the submitted applications and documents, admitted 158 (77.5%) judges, lawyers, and scholars to the next stage of the competition. At this stage, almost seven candidates are competing for each vacant position.

The following applicants were admitted:

  1. Andrii Andrushko
  2. Viktor Antypenko
  3. Viktoriia Babanina 
  4. Nataliia Baeva
  5. Viktoriia Bazeliuk
  6. Anton Baida
  7. Yevhen Baranovskyi
  8. Oleh Batiuk
  9. Viktoriia Bereziuk
  10. Yuliia Bobrova
  11. Yurii Bodnaruk
  12. Oleksandr Boiko
  13. Volodymyr Bubleinyk
  14. Yevhenii Vainovskyi
  15. Oleksandr Vernyhor 
  16. Volodymyr Vikhlyaiev
  17. Maksym Hloba
  18. Nataliia Hlushchenko
  19. Bohdan Holovinov
  20. Oleh Holovkov 
  21. Mykhailo Hrabynskyi
  22. Nazar Hryn
  23. Oleksii Huzovatyi
  24. Oksana Hutsal
  25. Andrii Davydenko
  26. Sofiia Danyliv
  27. Svitlana Demchenko
  28. Yevhen Didenko 
  29. Nazar Dilnyi
  30. Mariia Dmytriieva
  31. Artem Donets
  32. Nataliia Doroshenko
  33. Vitalii Dubas 
  34. Andrii Dudikov
  35. Oleksandr Dudchenko
  36. Dmytro Diachenko
  37. Oksana Yevlakh
  38. Oleksii Yevtushenko 
  39. Valerii Yehorov
  40. Mykola Zhuk 
  41. Oleksandr Zavhorodnii
  42. Oleksii Zaitsev
  43. Serhii Ivaniv 
  44. Andrii Ivanov
  45. Oleksandr Ivasyn
  46. Yevhen Kapitonov
  47. Andrii Kapura
  48. Stanislav Kashchenko
  49. Viktoriia Kytsiuk
  50. Oleh Kimstachov
  51. Yana Kinakh
  52. Oleksandr Kitov
  53. Mykyta Klymenko
  54. Oksana Knyzhenko
  55. Denys Kovalenko
  56. Serhii Kovalchuk
  57. Snizhana Kolesnyk
  58. Olha Kolos
  59. Tetiana Kononenko
  60. Ihor Korzhuk
  61. Oleksandr Korolenko
  62. Vitalii Koriahin
  63. Maryna Kostenko
  64. Oleh Kostiuk 
  65. Dmytro Kravets
  66. Ivan Kravchenko
  67. Oleksandr Kravchuk
  68. Yurii Krasnenko
  69. Dmytro Kratko
  70. Tetiana Kryklyva
  71. Vitalii Kryklyvyi
  72. Serhii Kuvakin
  73. Iryna Kuzina 
  74. Oleksii Kulabukhov
  75. Alfiia Kurbanova
  76. Svitlana Kustova
  77. Vladyslav Kukhta 
  78. Halyna Lavryk
  79. Oleksandr Leonov 
  80. Oleh Lutsenko
  81. Vitaliia Maier
  82. Ihor Maister
  83. Ihor Makaryk
  84. Roman Maksymovych
  85. Ninel Marchenko
  86. Oleh Marchuk 
  87. Viktor Maslov 
  88. Vita Matolych
  89. Nataliia Makhno
  90. Marian Mytsak
  91. Natalia Mytsak 
  92. Dmytro Mizevych
  93. Daria Minchenko 
  94. Dmytro Movchan
  95. Natalia Movchan
  96. Ivan Mukan
  97. Yevhenii Mushak
  98. Stanislav Nesterenko
  99. Ihor Nikitchuk
  100. Oleksandr Norochevskyi
  101. Svitlana Obolienska
  102. Ihor Omelian
  103. Dmytro Ostapenko 
  104. Oleksandr Ostrohliad
  105. Oksana Pavlenko
  106. Iryna Pashkevych
  107. Olha Pevna
  108. Oleksandr Pelykh
  109. Mykola Pika
  110. Andrii Polikanov
  111. Ivan Posokhov 
  112. Oleksandr Prokhorov
  113. Oleksandr Radutnyi
  114. Yuliia Retynska
  115. Volodymyr Rybalko
  116. Serhii Rykov
  117. Vladyslav Rikhter
  118. Andreia Rozdorozhna
  119. Olena Roik
  120. Petro Romanenko
  121. Mykola Rubashchenko
  122. Yurii Ruschak
  123. Aryna Sviatoshniuk
  124. Maksym Semenov
  125. Viktoriia Semko 
  126. Kateryna Sierikova 
  127. Serhii Syvokin
  128. Tetiana Symonova
  129. Kateryna Sikora
  130. Lesia Skreklia
  131. Sviatoslav Slyvka
  132. Inna Smal
  133. Inesa Sobolieva 
  134. Anna Sokratova
  135. Oleh Soloviov
  136. Oksana Steblynska
  137. Eduard Stomatov
  138. Yevhen Strilchenko
  139. Ihor Strohyi
  140. Olena Tanasevych
  141. Iryna Teslenko
  142. Maksym Tyden
  143. Iryna Tokarska
  144. Tetiana Troian
  145. Maksym Turchynskyi
  146. Andrii Fedoronchuk
  147. Yevhen Fedosieiev 
  148. Oleh Khamkhodera
  149. Kostiantyn Kharakoz
  150. Vadym Khodko
  151. Viktor Tsytriak
  152. Ihor Chaikin
  153. Viacheslav Shamrai
  154. Pavlo Shtifonov
  155. Andrii Yunusov
  156. Serhii Yurko
  157. Tamara Yaroshenko
  158. Marta-Mariia Yatsynina

At the same time, the Commission DID NOT admit the following 46 candidates:

  1. Oksana Batchenko
  2. Inna Berdnik
  3. Maryna Bohush
  4. Svitlana Brazaluk
  5. Olena Vakulenko
  6. Andrii Vovk
  7. Oleksandr Volochniuk
  8. Andrii Halyshyn
  9. Aliona Huk
  10. Nataliia Huk
  11. Oleksii Dieiev
  12. Serhii Dovhal
  13. Vasyl Zaitsev
  14. Olha Koban
  15. Anton Kosenko
  16. Hryhorii Krainyk 
  17. Liudmyla Krasnopolska
  18. Ivan Kruzhylov
  19. Dmytro Kuznietsov
  20. Khrystyna Kuzmiv 
  21. Olha Lemishchenko
  22. Oleksii Makivskyi
  23. Andrii Mylanych
  24. Liubomyr Moisei
  25. Valerii Nikitchenko
  26. Daria Nikolaienko
  27. Liliia Orel
  28. Iryna Pavliuk
  29. Inessa Pozniak
  30. Andrii Polishchuk
  31. Vitalii Prydatko
  32. Oleh Radionov 
  33. Olena Riepnikova
  34. Serhii Roiak
  35. Liubov Savonik
  36. Oleksandr Sarafaniuk
  37. Viacheslav Slavinskyi
  38. Pavlo Slipchuk
  39. Yuliia Stusenko
  40. Tetiana Tereshchenko
  41. Kateryna Tytarenko
  42. Svitlana Tokova
  43. Dmytro Fedorov
  44. Oleksandr Yakovlev
  45. Dmytro Yaprakh
  46. Oleksii Yasiunetskyi.

The most common reasons for rejection, as in the previous competition, were: 

  • Failure to submit a declaration of the absence of circumstances provided for in Article 7(4) of the Law of Ukraine on the High Anti-Corruption Court 
  • Failure to confirm the required professional legal experience
  • Failure to submit a copy of the diploma with transcripts
  • Failure to provide a certificate of proficiency in the state language.

Interestingly, in the previous HACC competition, the most frequent reasons for disqualification also included failure to submit declarations (asset, integrity, or family ties). This time, such issues were largely absent.

As of now, the HQCJ has not decided on the admission of only one candidate — Vitalii Humeniuk, Chief Consultant of the Secretariat of the Central Election Commission, regarding whom a recusal motion was filed by one of the Commission members. The admission of this last applicant will be resolved on September 29 at 09:30.

array(3) { ["quote_image"]=> bool(false) ["quote_text"]=> string(220) "Interestingly, in the previous HACC competition, the most frequent reasons for disqualification also included failure to submit declarations (asset, integrity, or family ties). This time, such issues were largely absent." ["quote_author"]=> string(0) "" }

Interestingly, in the previous HACC competition, the most frequent reasons for disqualification also included failure to submit declarations (asset, integrity, or family ties). This time, such issues were largely absent.

The admitted participants will next face a qualification exam and interviews with the HQCJ and the PCIE. 

The exam will consist of written tests and a practical assignment, with the Commission already publishing a tentative testing schedule:

  • October 1, 2025 – test on the history of Ukrainian statehood
  • October 13, 2025 – test on general legal knowledge and knowledge of the specialization of the relevant court
  • October 27, 2025 – cognitive skills test
  • November 12 and 14, 2025 – practical assignment.

We hope the HQCJ will hold the exam on the announced dates and demonstrate quick and high-quality results of the selection process. Delays, as in the previous competition, risk derailing the process, since less than eight months remain before the mandate of the PCIE expires. 

This is already the third competition for the High Anti-Corruption Court, but this time it will be held under somewhat new rules. In particular, the updated conditions will allow the passing threshold for IQ and history of Ukrainian statehood tests to be set lower than 75% of correct answers — previously, the inability to lower this threshold led to the elimination of 64.2% of participants.

We can already see that the legislative amendments on competitions, introduced in June, are yielding positive results: 88 of the 205 applicants this year had previously taken part in competitions for appellate courts and the earlier HACC competition. It was precisely the removal in June of the one-year restriction on repeat participation that significantly broadened the pool of candidates for judicial positions at the HACC.

array(3) { ["quote_image"]=> bool(false) ["quote_text"]=> string(250) "We can already see that the legislative amendments on competitions, introduced in June, are yielding positive results: 88 of the 205 applicants this year had previously taken part in competitions for appellate courts and the earlier HACC competition." ["quote_author"]=> string(0) "" }

We can already see that the legislative amendments on competitions, introduced in June, are yielding positive results: 88 of the 205 applicants this year had previously taken part in competitions for appellate courts and the earlier HACC competition.