A number of NGOs have issued statements on politically motivated decisions regarding the Prosecutor General’s Office and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau.

Representatives of civil society insist that the posts of the Prosecutor General and Director of NABU have become a bargaining chip in political games. Thus, in recent weeks, the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau have come under pressure. 

MPs registered an illegal decision on the dismissal of NABU Director Artem Sytnyk. Key experts, the Ministry of Justice and the National Agency on Corruption Prevention confirm that the resolution does not meet the statutory requirements. 

NGO representatives say that such steps are an infringement of the independence of the Bureau. After all, NABU was established as a law enforcement agency for investigating top-corruption crimes. And to ensure the independence of the institution, the legislator provided a number of guarantees.

Among such guarantees are a special procedure and an exclusive list of grounds for dismissal of the NABU Director. In particular, the appointment of a group of independent auditors; based on the results of their work a decision on the effectiveness of the Bureau and the possible dismissal of the director should be made. 

Prosecutor General Ruslan Riaboshapka is under threat of dismissal. MPs resumed collecting signatures for a no-confidence vote. 

NGOs insist that Ruslan Riaboshapka is the first Prosecutor General to launch a large-scale “purge” of the prosecutor’s office in the process of reform. An attempt to dismiss him indicates a desire to immediately stop any changes to the system. In particular, stop the attestation of prosecutors of all levels.

Along with this, the Minister of Internal Affairs and the bodies of the National Police remain intact. Despite the obvious and numerous crimes of the police, the authorities continue to retain the position of the infamous Arsen Avakov for unknown reasons. Similarly, the promised reform of the Security Service of Ukraine remains neglected.

NGOs are convinced that it is a banal attempt to usurp the power over law enforcement and the prosecutor’s office. Both dismissal efforts go hand in hand with strengthening the positions of the unreformed Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Security Service of Ukraine. And the dismissal of the heads of the Prosecutor General’s Office and NABU will gain profit for Minister Arsen Avakov and oligarch Ihor Kolomoiskyi. After all, it is NABU and the Prosecutor General’s Office that accumulate criminal proceedings against Privatbank and the entourage of the Minister of Internal Affairs.

Such initiatives are unacceptable and undermine public and international confidence in the Ukrainian Parliament and the President. The creation of the NABU and guaranteeing its independence, as well as the reform of the Prosecutor’s Office, were key requirements of our international partners.


Anti-Corruption Action Center 

Transparency International Ukraine

Centre for Civic Monitoring and Research


Center for Economic Strategy 


Institute of Legislative Ideas

Platform Civic Control

Anti-Corruption Research and Education Center

Media Initiative for Human Rights

Anti-Corruption Headquarters

DEJURE Foundation

Unity and Development

Women’s Anti-Corruption Movement

Trypilskyi Krai

Lviv Regulatory Hub

Young Cherkasy Region

The Independent Defence Anti-Corruption Committee (NAKO)